| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
sam davidson |
Battle Timer on Rome Total War |
Lead | ||
|
Anyone know how to turn it off??
|
||||
|
|
||||
Saught |
#1 | |||
|
When you start your campaign,
|
||||
|
|
||||
sam davidson |
#2 | |||
|
I can't see the option, which page should it be on? On the page where you pick your faction there isn't a button that turns off the timer?? |
||||
|
|
||||
WPatton12 |
#3 | |||
|
It should be right there on the same page as the faction selection screen, down where you choose things like long or short campaign. It didn't show up for
me either after I started a new RTW vanillia campaign.
|
||||
|
|
||||
gluteus maximus |
#4 | |||
|
If you press ESC during the campaign, there should be an option to turn off the battle timer.
|
||||
|
|
||||
as the sun sets |
#5 | |||
|
on a similar note, what exactly the appeal of having the timer turned on? just for challenge/realism sake? i always turn it off, it kills game experience
|
||||
|
|
||||
Parallel Pain |
#6 | |||
|
Well having it turned on means a defending side would only have to hold on for XX minutes (around 40) to win and the offensive side only have that amount of time to win. It doesn't kill game experience (except, no offense, to player with no strategic mind and just rush blindly ahead with the best unit possible, like that
Urban Cohort guy we saw the other day). In fact it adds to it. Quite a few times my hand was forced by the timer to rush the town square before reorganizing my
lines because it took too long to drive the enemy off the walls. And there are other times during all kinds of battle where going on the offensive was suicide
and I was more than happy to win by waiting it out. In fact, the other day I just fought one of those battles. I had a half stack of Camillian legions in EB
facing 2 full stacks of Gallic/Spanish units. Since this was VH battle on EB there's no way I can win on the offensive so I tried to hold on. I was
overwhelmed with 1 minute 40 seconds to go |
||||
|
|
||||
Alexis Synelnik |
#7 | |||
|
Interesting thing that happened to me yesterday. I was besieging the Carthage sity. There was a lot of enemy units and fighting would seem be hard to me. At
the end of the battle a few Carthaginian men remained on the sity square. Time almost all is gone, just dozens of seconds left. I ordered my cavalry to charge
and destroy the enemy. When this task was fulfilled I awfully noticed that several (3 or 5)enemy men were standing on the walls broken and fighting to death!
In a hurry I forgot to finish them off, considering them not to threaten me!!! And I was defeated with my huge army, battle time was over, half of enemy units
was healed from casualties. Is this honest? In real life I would win easily, 3 or 5 men would do nothing with my army.
I got angry so much that I hired mercenaries half of stack and attacked once more at the same turn. They were totally killed... I didn't show mercy to anybody, the sity was terminated, all buildings were teared down by roman powerful hands. |
||||
|
|
||||
GreyFox |
#8 | |||
|
Well they would have had some time to heal, plus there's the population of the city and all that.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Christopher the Great |
#9 | |||
|
I once found it very useful, in a loss. I was playing XGM, and my Royal Spartan guard slaughtered some infantry and all that was left was archers. Easy kill
right? Wrong. They ran. They ran forever. I turned it on triple speed hoping my guys would catch them, but nope, they ran till the timer ran out. If I
didn't have the timer, I would have had to quit, and lost some valuable Spartan Guards.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Parallel Pain |
#10 | |||
|
You could've also pressed the withdraw button no?
|
||||
|
|
||||
Christopher the Great |
#11 | |||
|
Yeah actually, as soon as I finished posting I went upstairs for a bite to eat and realised that I could have just done that :p.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Tombles |
#12 | |||
|
I never used to play with the battle timer. Then I experienced passive AI during a siege- I waited for ages, but the enemy troops just stood there out of range
of my towers. Eventually I had to sally out of the city with my phalanx pikemen, which were cut to pieces out in the open. Inside the city streets they would
have destroyed my attackers. So now I play with the battle timer, and if there is a passive AI in a siege battle, I just take it as an easy win and wait it
out. Yes, the battle timer can be annoying, but it's nowhere near as annoying as losing a city just because the AI troops won't move.
|
||||
|
|
||||
13 Spears |
#13 | |||
|
I always use the timer, mostly for the various reasons already stated. The timer does give me an upper hand when defending (the option to run out the clock
where possible) but the disadvantage of having to hurry an attack makes up for that, especially in sieges.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Irish Warhero |
#14 | |||
|
Posts: 13 09/30/07 09:20:30 |
i find its better for it off because its more hard if your are assaulting or defending a castle ?
|
|||
|
|
||||
Messalla Corvinus |
#15 | |||
|
I agree. But it's better not to post in threads that have been dormant for months, unless you have something really important to add. Posting in such
threads is called "necroposting" and is considered not-done on these forums.
|
||||
|
|
||||